Reverse Deterrence in Racial Profiling
نویسندگان
چکیده
A controlled experiment tested the possibility that racial profiling—disproportionate scrutiny of a minority racial group by sanctioned authorities—would have a “reverse deterrent” effect on the illicit behavior of members of a nonprofiled majority group. Research participants given a task involving extremely difficult anagrams were given the opportunity to cheat. White participants randomly assigned to a condition in which two Black confederates were obtrusively singled out for scrutiny by the study administrator cheated more than Whites in a White-profiling condition and a no-profiling control condition, and more than Black participants in all three conditions. Black participants cheated at comparable levels across the three experimental conditions. The effect of the profiling of Blacks was consequently a net increase in cheating. The results indicate that racial profiling may be counterproductive.
منابع مشابه
Reverse deterrence in racial profiling: Increased transgressions by the non-profiled group
A controlled experiment tested the possibility that racial profiling – disproportionate scrutiny of minorities by sanctioned authorities – would have “reverse deterrent” effects on the illicit behavior of members of non-profiled groups (e.g., Whites). Research participants given a task involving extremely difficult anagrams were given the opportunity to cheat. White participants randomly assign...
متن کاملReverse deterrence in racial profiling: increased transgressions by nonprofiled whites.
A controlled experiment tested the possibility that racial profiling-disproportionate scrutiny of a minority racial group by sanctioned authorities-would have a "reverse deterrent" effect on the illicit behavior of members of a nonprofiled majority group. Research participants given a task involving extremely difficult anagrams were given the opportunity to cheat. White participants randomly as...
متن کاملDeterrence Externalities and Racial Bias in Law Enforcement
Knowles, Persico, and Todd (2001) develop a test for racial bias in traffic stops that is predicated on the notion that it is the hit rate—the rate at which motor-vehicle searches result in the seizure of physical evidence—and not the rate of traffic stops or vehicle searches, that should be used to discern whether disparities in police treatment are due to racial bias or statistical discrimina...
متن کاملSearch Profiling with Partial Knowledge of Deterrence
Consider the choice of a profiling policy where decisions to search for evidence of crime may vary with observable covariates of the persons at risk of search. I pose a planning problem whose objective is to minimise the social cost of crime and search. The consequences of a search rule depend on the extent to which search deters crime. I study the planning problem when the planner has partial ...
متن کاملMeasuring Racial Profiling
What if racial profiling were useful? Even, perhaps, very useful? Are the costs of racial profiling so significant that racial profiling should be banned? Courts and commentators do not ask these questions; indeed, they rarely, if ever, acknowledge that racial profiling may be useful. This paper explores what costs police would have to justify, and how they might do so in order to use racial pr...
متن کامل